Hi guys,
Microsoft has released new update for SII feature which afects Spain (more details here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/4509918/spain-sii-validation-rules-change-from-october-1-2019-dynamics-ax-2012).
There is a hotfix to achieve this but I have one question:
It is just run the hotfix and compile the application + post configuration or it is something more sophisticated. I've receive odd feedback from my partner and I want to be sure.
thank you
Dear All,
I need some advice with the following. Recently we moved to new servers, which was done without any software upgrades, so application code is basically the same. There were no changes in any relevant parameters either, so the expectation was that the system will behave the same. Unfortunately after first Master Scheduling in the new environment a curious (and highly problematic to us) thing happened regarding Net requirements. Inventory blocking transactions, the ones created manually using Inventory and Warehouse Management>Periodic>Inventory blocking feature, started recognizing only one (physical reservation) transaction and totally ignoring the receipt transaction (created due to Expected receipts being checked)
In our old environment, as well as in our Acceptance environment, since the inventory transaction’s Expected Date on both of them is the same, they cancel each other out and are ignored by MRP (no entries on any of them in the ReqTrans), which is the way we like it. I should also mention that there were no customizations in this area.
Unfortunately in the new Production environment MRP recognizes the physical reservation , showing it as a Stock journal reqTrans, (which I know is OK). This issue pegs against the On-hand (which is also OK). The problem is however that it ignores the expected receipt, leaving us with ‘fake requirement’ that can lead to unnecessary purchasing.
As mentioned – no changes in setup or code. There are also no batches involved – this is the simplest possible item with Site, Warehouse, Location and nothing else. This problem applies to all blocked items, so it is not item specific. After a day of chasing the root cause I ran out of ideas. Any suggestions on where to look further?
Hello , Could you please help me ,
This work was right , untill i change the table and the datasource in the form ,
I was working with WHSDedouanementType , and i just create a copy from this table called WHSDedouanementType_Ref ,
So this error appeare when i do that .
Need Your Helps
Thnx
Hi,
Please could I ask some advice on extended marking, I’m not sure if the following issue is the norm for AX or if it’s a set up issue.
We recently started to use the extended marking function when firming planned orders, all looked fine until we deleted a pick ticket either certain lines or in its entirety (this includes partial pick, reducing consumption). The problem is once the pick ticket/line has been removed the marking also removes and on checking looks like its marked to itself (a ? symbol is against the line in the marking table), its almost like a ghost mark as its not actually marked to anything. The line then needs to be re-marked. This is a problem as we have a particularly large BoM’s, containing subs, phantoms etc.
I’m not certain but I think it might be how the Lot-ID is being used by AX.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thank you,
Hi All,
We've implemented the line level 'Cancel' for Return order and when we try to perform 'Complete' on return order form currently it will fetch the returns total,charges,tax etc. for all the lines but we need to modify this logic so that 'Canceled' status should not included in the calculation for return order complete.could you help me in achieving this ?
Hi All.
I have a small requirement as , I have a base enum and that enum is used in a form and The Enum has 65 Literals in it.
But i want to show only 10 Literals on a particular form for that combo box .
How can i hide the remaining Literals in D365 F&O
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
K
I know you can set parameters to have a production order RAF when the last operation is ended. The problem with this is that AX uses the warehouse location set on the production order. We would like the user to be able to specify the warehouse location before the production order is RAF. It would be very good if the RAF journal could automaticly be opened, not automaticly posted as it is in standard AX. Is there a parameter to have the system open the RAF journal when the last operation is ended?
/Henrik
In standard sales order cycle delivery remainder gets updated (Ordered quantity - Reserved quantity) after delivery note is posted. But my client needs to update delivery remainder after sales order confirmation (Considering after SO confirmation the sales line would become non-editable). I believe that incorporating this requirement might affect some standard processes.
Is it advisable to deviate standard SO process behavior this way? It would be great if by any chance you have an idea of the impacts of this customization.
Thanks in advance.
I try to import and create released product with entity Released products creation V2
For the first import it worked fine. Now I created a second list with OTHER products (Product and item number not used yet) and this import fails telling me:
File contains duplicate rows, cannot insert data into staging due to unique key violation
There are no duplicated rows in the file and as I said Itemnumber and product number is unique
How can I solve this issue
Hi every body
I create load with loadbuilding work bench.
just show me this message.I want to know that how can i handle this message?
"Loads are created for the proposed loads. You can view the loads in the Load planning workbench form."
"The load building session is in an unexpected state. The state of the session is Loads proposed, but it must be Loads created."
Thanks
Sepideh
We are running a special promotion to allow customers to get a discount if orders meet a certain dollar amount. I want to enter and add the discount at the order level. Can you provide any info on how to set up? I have a discount set up for a specific customer group which is working great but want to now set up and enter at the time the order is entered.
Hello everyone,
Just needing some information around how best to design a workflow in our CRM which has a sms sent to a customer, apposed to making a call.
Cheers Ben
Hello guys,
In Pending vendor invoices, when you click a Vendor Invoice, it shows that the Match Variance is okay (Checked), but why does the Last Match status still show Warning? Is this a normal occurrence or is this a bug somewhat?
We have a worker who was exempt from FICA and Medicare taxes through the first half of 2019 and was receiving pay checks throughout this time period. Now this worker is no longer exempt and must pay these taxes starting in July 2019.
In the worker's first check in July - the software is attempting to "catch up" on all of the FICA and Medicare taxes and is causing the worker to have a 0.00 pay statement due to the large tax amounts for FICA and MEDI that are in the pay statement.
The FICA and Medicare tax codes on the worker record had their original "version" expired AND a new version was entered to start on the July pay period. However, this does not seem to have affected the tax "buckets" for this worker within the tax engine.
The only way that I know of to get around this would be to create a brand new worker record which would then reset the tax bucket dates to July. If possible, I would like to avoid creating a brand new worker record but, in my mind, this looks like a bug BUT has anyone experienced this issue and got around it?
Hi all,
I would like to be able to reconcile the sales invoice number and value against the costs used to generate that invoice in a GL account. The invoices I am talking about are recharge sales invoices. Currently we post costs to an intercompany suspense account. These costs come from different parts of the system. They include timesheets, purchase invoice costs, and expenses. I would like to be able to offset the invoice value against the costs. Obviously the individual costs that have been posted to the system have their own voucher number and other reference numbers, and the sales invoice has its own reference number as well. But can or does the system mark the already posted costs in some way so as to be able to net the invoice values and costs, so as to be able to clear down the transactions in a reconciliation.
I have personalised the GL account pulling in all possible fields that might provide a reference that I can identify with in the 'Project management and accounting' module where the sales invoices are prepared. But I am unable to find a link with the personalisation in any area in this part of the system. I have looked in inquiries, and reports and other part of the system in the Project module.
Has anyone else had this issue? If so how did you find a solution? or is there no solution? Is it a setup issue?
Any and all help would be much appreciated.
Many thanks!
Jason.
Dear Experts,
In our organization, all of our departments are working on dynamics ax 2012 R3. One of our department Engineering is demanding work in dynamics ax. As the department is saying that we want to add our info in ax as well. There work is repairing all faulty things such as production machinery, electricity, building repairing, doors, glasses, internet wires repairing ETC. Please suggest me which module will be suitable for them, and how they will maintain there work in dynamics ax .Many thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Shabir Ahmad
Dear All,
is there a way that we can do the closing transaction by Financial Dimension in AX 2012R3?
Best
HAYAN
I have Dynamics AX 2012 R3, the purchase requisition is workflow and working fine, to the last approval step before ending workflow and closing purchase requisition to be appears in "close" status to be ready to convert it to Purchase Order.
In P.R. workflow when last user click on "Approve" to close the cycle, an information log box appears "not warning or error" with the following message:
"One or more accounting distributions is missing a ledger account. Use the Accounting distribution form or the Posting profile to update the ledger account."
And final approval not applied with P.R. still in "In review" status, so i create the P.O. manually.
I have go through the following checks:
1- I review the account distribution in Purchase Requisition and i found it is normal format combination structure with required financial dimensions as in Ledger structure "Ledger Account-Sector-Department-Region-Cost Center". no thing missing.
2- The above information log message appeared only when click on "Approve" into final step in workflow.
3- The above information log message appeared only when choose specific items in P.R. not for all items.
4- When creating Other P.R. with other items the final approval going OK with closing P.R. and ready to auto P.O. creation.
May i have any help for the above strange case for fixing it?
